$5,000 Fine Issued over Arthur Residence Lacking a Working Smoke Alarm

Latest News

Message from our Symposium Keynote Speaker Peter Katz

A message from our Symposium Keynote speaker Peter Katz Peter Katz is a Juno Award- and Canadian Screen Award-nominated singer-songwriter who has spent the past 20 years touring internationally. He has been described by many of his fans and speaking clients as “a thunderbolt for the soul”. A gifted storyteller fluent in English and French,

Read More »

Membership Renewal Reminder

OMFPOA Memberships expire at the end of each calendar year. As we have had ongoing website construction and upgrades being completed we have not removed any accounts that have yet to pay for 2023. Our membership continues to increase and we hope to have you as part of our association. This post is to serve

Read More »

An article by Vik Kirsch of the Guelph Mercury on Wednesday November 23, 2011.

ARTHUR — North Wellington fire prevention officer Jason Benn is hopeful a recent $5,000 fine in a Guelph court is a wake-up call that people must have working smoke alarms in their residences.

Benn said there were gasps from the courtroom’s public gallery when the sharp fine was levied.

“I think that sends a message,” Benn said Tuesday.

On a fire safety inspection July 5, officials from Wellington North Fire Services entered a rental farmhouse east of Arthur, on Wellington County Road 109, at the request of Ontario Provincial Police investigating a possible marijuana-growing operation.

Inspection by firefighters found insufficient smoke alarms and one that wasn’t working.

The fine was levied Nov. 16 in Guelph against a Mississauga landlord for failing to maintain working smoke alarms in the rental property, contrary to the Ontario Fire Code.

Fire alarms are required, Benn said, on each floor of a dwelling. The preferred location is outside bedroom areas on those levels where people sleep.

Benn said fire officials are increasingly focusing on fire alarms and taking action against transgressions. Though that hasn’t yet reached the point of zero tolerance, Benn said it’s not far off the mark these days.

As to fines, the $5,000 one in this latest incident isn’t the stiffest he’s encountered to date.

“It’s not the highest fine I’ve ever seen.” He recalled one in which a landlord was given a fine of about $15,000, though that was for a few fire code transgressions.