Reply To: Corridor Decorative Films (ASTM E84 vs. CAN/ULC-S102 and/or CAN/ULC-S109)

Latest News

Call for nominations for 2023 Annual Awards

March 9, 2023

OMFPOA Executive are requesting annual nominations for the following awards, please nominate deserving individuals: Jim Copeland Award Dave Sylvester Student Bursary Al Suleman Award (Fire Prevention Employee of the Year) Fire Chief of the Year Award The deadline for submissions is 26 April 2023.

Read More »

2023 Symposium Hotel Bookings

March 9, 2023

  Delta Hotels London Armouries has created a website to enable Symposium attendees to register at the discounted rate. Follow the instructions below to book . Further information on the Symposium and registration forms can be found here. Book your group rate for OMFPOA 2023 Symposium Thank you for considering to stay at the Delta

Read More »

HOME › Forums › Forums › Fire Code & Enforcement › Corridor Decorative Films (ASTM E84 vs. CAN/ULC-S102 and/or CAN/ULC-S109) › Reply To: Corridor Decorative Films (ASTM E84 vs. CAN/ULC-S102 and/or CAN/ULC-S109)

May 17, 2022 at 1:05 pm #14413
Andrew McMillanAndrew McMillan
Participant

Hi Matt,

From my understanding, ATSM84 is equivalent to CAN/ULC-S102. It might be best to have them present this as an alternative solution. The big issue that I have found is that some of the vinyl films exceed the flame spread rating allowed.

Feel free to reach out

amcmillan@stclairfire.ca