Reply To: Inspection – 2 apartments over an insurance business

Latest News

Call for nominations for 2023 Annual Awards

OMFPOA Executive are requesting annual nominations for the following awards, please nominate deserving individuals: Jim Copeland Award Dave Sylvester Student Bursary Al Suleman Award (Fire Prevention Employee of the Year) Fire Chief of the Year Award The deadline for submissions is 26 April 2023.

Read More »

2023 Symposium Hotel Bookings

  Delta Hotels London Armouries has created a website to enable Symposium attendees to register at the discounted rate. Follow the instructions below to book . Further information on the Symposium and registration forms can be found here. Book your group rate for OMFPOA 2023 Symposium Thank you for considering to stay at the Delta

Read More »

HOME Forums Forums Fire Code & Enforcement Inspection – 2 apartments over an insurance business Reply To: Inspection – 2 apartments over an insurance business

John WilsonJohn Wilson

I completely agree that the F Orders are there for us to use as we see appropriate and that they are supported by OFM. Considering the huge number of 1 or 2 dwelling units plus a commercial unit that have been specifically excluded from Retrofit and even old row houses, there is a huge portion of properties that are excluded. I guess part of my hesitation to use an F Order is how many properties here have enough issues with 2, 6, & 9 and the efforts to get compliance on them that I don’t need to add to my workload and my Chief supports this position. Personally, I don’t loose any sleep over not going further than minimum nor do I deter anyone else from going as far as they/their department like.

I completely agree with your last paragraph. Even after an inspection (and the associated repairs), I never write a letter stating that it meets or complies with the Fire Code.  I write “The deficiencies identified on the (date) Order/Report/Letter have been corrected and there are no other noted deficiencies at the time of last inspection.”